Skip to main content

Connecting the Dots


1.      Half of my blog posts connect the prompts back to my work experience, interning and working as a warehouse associate. This isn’t all surprising to me because a large portion of the topics so far are somehow related to the workforce. Another theme that I noticed when reviewing my old posts is that all of them are pessimistic. They point out negative aspects of jobs I’ve had or poke holes in situations I’ve been in. I didn’t intentionally do this and only noticed once I reread them. I’m assuming this is because it could be easier to write from a negative point of view and I subconsciously was doing this.

2.       Within my opportunism blog post, I was able to connect to the idea of labor being used as a buffer. I experienced it firsthand and never truly realized exactly what was happening until I took this class. Looking back at it now, it is clear that I could have connected this idea into my first blog post. This was a post about transaction costs and during part of it I focused on that there were a few days where I did not have much work to do. Looking back at it, it is clear that I was being used as a buffer. When more work came in or one person needed some help, I had help and make the workload smaller. This is a clear example as labor being used as a buffer, and I didn’t make this connection until after the blog post was posted.

3.       Although when I submit my posts has stayed about the same, I typically start brainstorming and working on them much earlier. For my first two posts, the biography and 9/13 one, I struggled to write clear substantive post. I had bad writers block and wrote very slowly. However, the next posts I began brainstorming and coming up with possible writing ideas far earlier. Now when I sit down to type out my blog post, I have a clear idea what I am going to write about and in my opinion I write better posts faster.

4.      I liked the Illinibucks blog post question because it allowed me to problem solve and think about a hypothetical situation. I wouldn’t want all posts to be like this; however, it was interesting to see how others viewed the hypothetical situation. It helped understand the economic theory because I had to directly apply and discuss it.

Comments

  1. Hmmm. I wonder why you felt compelled to write this as a list. It wouldn't have occurred to me to do that.

    I do think student experience may be be limited in learning course themes, but it was you have available to you and you learn by making connections between what you've already experienced and what is new for you. So that you were being used as a buffer in your warehouse job, serves as a good example to make the point.

    Several other students (in this class and in prior offerings of the class) have said they liked the Illinibucks post because it gave them a hypothetical to consider, something they normally don't do. There is, perhaps, a lesson in this observation. Maybe you should try your own hypothetical in a future post and write to it rather than writing to the prompt. You might find it liberating and helpful for guiding your future learning.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post 3

The summer after my freshman year I worked in a textbook warehouse as a warehouse associate. For the first week on the job, my sole responsibility was to stand near a conveyor belt and take totes with books off the line and sort the totes by the colored labels on them. This was at best mind numbing and monotonous, but it had to be done. Because this was early in the summer, the company was solely focused on buying used books to resell in the fall, so everyday hundreds of new books would be brought into the warehouse. The totes I took off would be picked up by other workers and the books inside would be placed in their appropriate location in the warehouse. This job, at least in my opinion, was far superior because it allowed you to walk around all day rather than being stuck along a conveyor belt for eight hours a day. However, after about a week and a half working the line, I was trained on the technology and began working as one of the people who put books away. I enjoyed this ...

Blog Post 4: Teams

            Group project can be one of the most annoying assignments required to do because of the possibility of being stuck doing the majority of work. Fortunately, the majority of group projects I have been part of haven’t turned out like this; however, they had other smaller problems. Almost all of the group projects I have been part of were for upper level econ classes. This has the benefit that most students chose to take these classes, so they are generally more knowledgeable and interested in the course content. This typically solves the problem of one or two students doing the entire project, but solving this problem uncovers a few smaller problems. My most recent group project is a prime example of some of these smaller problems.             This group project was for Econ 460, Financial Economics, and our team had to research and present on the financial health...

Final post

            Most of the 400 level economics classes I have taken, have not required attendance. Nearly all of them strongly encouraged it by reviewing the homework questions prior to the due date or limiting the slide shows posted on compass. The classes I have taken where attendance is required have almost exclusively been intro level classes, one hundred or two hundred level. I think the theory behind this is that intro level classes are needed to form a foundation of knowledge, but upper level classes are chosen and should fit your interests. In this system you are more or less forced to learn the intro material, even if it is in area you aren’t interested in. However, in later classes, attendance is expected to be higher because these classes aren’t specifically required, but rather chosen from a list. Although this is what would theoretically happen, in reality when attendance isn’t required not as many students show up to ...