Many classes I have taken have required attendance
and require you to sign in or answer an I-clicker question in order to receive credit;
however, all of them offered at least a few free absences. In my experience,
most days this greatly increased the overall class attendance, but for a few
days out of the year attendance would drop off significantly. Classes on Fridays
before breaks or long weekends had a significantly lower attendance, even lower
than those with no attendance policy. Much like the article that talked about
how more parents were late to pick up their kids after a fine was imposed, students
were more likely to skip classes that required attendance but offered a few
days of allowed skips. When these students use their free skips, they are essentially
purchasing an absence. They don’t feel bad about skipping class because they
are giving up one of their free absences. Attendance in all classes before
break is generally lower but having a certain number of absences seems to
increase the number of students who skip class before breaks. This is also
nearly identical to the example about the firehouse that imposed a strict amount
of sick days, and after sick days were mostly taken on or near holidays. People
don’t seem to care as much when there is a set price for their actions.
When I was in engineering, a few classes had quizzes
that had to be taken at the CBTF (Computer Based Testing Facility). The CBTF is
essentially a computer lab with a proctor and the computers had limited capabilities.
This allows professors to use online exams and hopefully limit the amount of cheating.
The one class that I had to take that utilized this facility was Theoretical
and Applied Mechanics (TAM210). In this class we had bi-weekly quizzes and were
given a four-day window where we could schedule a time slot to take the quiz in
the CBTF. The window typically started Tuesday morning and ended Friday night,
and without fail Fridays always had the fewest available times. An optimist would
likely assume that this is because that’s when students have the fewest classes
or they want the extra time to study. However, the longer I was in the class
the more obvious it became that the real reason was because it made it very
easy to cheat.
I never cheated on these quizzes; however, a large
portion of students did. The way these quizzes were created and taken made it
very easy for students to cheat. Every quiz was only four to seven questions, and
each question was some type of physics question. Solving these questions
basically involved creating force equations from diagrams and then using these equations
to solve for some unknown variable. Each
student that takes these quizzes would get the same scenario, but they had
different numbers. This stopped people from remembering the exact answers and
telling them to a friend, but because all these questions were the same situation
it was very easy to remember the diagrams and the method to solve them. I knew people
who would take turns taking the quizzes first so that every time at least one
of them would receive a good grade. Cheating was so rampant that before classes
within the quiz window, I could here other students discussing the quizzes and
how to solve them. When given a set amount of time to take the quizzes, it
makes cheating very easy. I knew people who would be considered moral and wouldn’t
lie or cheat on nearly anything, but they cheated on these quizzes. It was so
easy to talk about and so many others were cheating, they likely didn’t feel guilty.
In the article about fairness it made it clear that generally people want to be
treated fairly, so they could’ve felt that because so many others were cheating
their cheating, in their minds, levelled the playing ground. These quizzes were
extremely difficult, which could also likely explain the large amount of
cheating. However, it was clear that the main driver of cheating was giving
students a window to take the quiz. I didn’t cheat and didn’t want to get
involved in it, so I never learned why so many students cheated. I also took
this class nearly two years ago, so I’m not sure if the class is run the same
way, but I hope that they found a better way to administer their exams or
quizzes.
I'm not sure you're aware of this but for the Thanksgiving break, in particular, we used to have classes through the Wednesday right before the actual holiday. Indeed, that was the patter at most universities. When I was at Northwestern and would fly to NYC to see my parents (whose wedding anniversary was on Thanksgiving) it would be incredibly crowded. I learned that the Wednesday before Thanksgiving was the busiest day for air travel in the entire year. Somebody in the faculty Senate finally figured out that since actual attendance was low on Monday, lower on Tuesday, and then totally abysmal on Wednesday, we should just give those days off (and start three days earlier in the semester to offset that). Now students have the full week off, but still play the attendance games the week before. Hmmm.
ReplyDeleteI think in a class like ours, where there is at least some class discussion attendance is a gift, as is participating in the discussion itself. Judging by how the class has performed this way, it would seem that many students don't agree. The last time I taught I did have an incentive of sorts to encourage attendance. Frankly, I'm more than a little disturbed by the current behavior. But I'm gathering it is the norm now. I think it is different in a large lecture class. Missing class makes more sense to me there.
Regarding your other story about cheating, I won't ask you to comment on whether the same thing is happening with the quizzes in Moodle. I just want to note that a different explanation could be given for the Friday sessions being the most crowded. That is procrastination. Students do things at or near the deadline. So I wonder if you can actually "know" which is the true explanation and then how you know that. I will say the perception of widespread cheating almost sure has a pernicious impact on learning, even for those students who don't cheat, because they are caught up in the unfairness of it all. Given that, how could the instructional staff for the course not realize what's going on? That too needs some explanation.