Skip to main content

Blog Post 7



Many classes I have taken have required attendance and require you to sign in or answer an I-clicker question in order to receive credit; however, all of them offered at least a few free absences. In my experience, most days this greatly increased the overall class attendance, but for a few days out of the year attendance would drop off significantly. Classes on Fridays before breaks or long weekends had a significantly lower attendance, even lower than those with no attendance policy. Much like the article that talked about how more parents were late to pick up their kids after a fine was imposed, students were more likely to skip classes that required attendance but offered a few days of allowed skips. When these students use their free skips, they are essentially purchasing an absence. They don’t feel bad about skipping class because they are giving up one of their free absences. Attendance in all classes before break is generally lower but having a certain number of absences seems to increase the number of students who skip class before breaks. This is also nearly identical to the example about the firehouse that imposed a strict amount of sick days, and after sick days were mostly taken on or near holidays. People don’t seem to care as much when there is a set price for their actions.

When I was in engineering, a few classes had quizzes that had to be taken at the CBTF (Computer Based Testing Facility). The CBTF is essentially a computer lab with a proctor and the computers had limited capabilities. This allows professors to use online exams and hopefully limit the amount of cheating. The one class that I had to take that utilized this facility was Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (TAM210). In this class we had bi-weekly quizzes and were given a four-day window where we could schedule a time slot to take the quiz in the CBTF. The window typically started Tuesday morning and ended Friday night, and without fail Fridays always had the fewest available times. An optimist would likely assume that this is because that’s when students have the fewest classes or they want the extra time to study. However, the longer I was in the class the more obvious it became that the real reason was because it made it very easy to cheat.

I never cheated on these quizzes; however, a large portion of students did. The way these quizzes were created and taken made it very easy for students to cheat. Every quiz was only four to seven questions, and each question was some type of physics question. Solving these questions basically involved creating force equations from diagrams and then using these equations to solve for some unknown variable.  Each student that takes these quizzes would get the same scenario, but they had different numbers. This stopped people from remembering the exact answers and telling them to a friend, but because all these questions were the same situation it was very easy to remember the diagrams and the method to solve them. I knew people who would take turns taking the quizzes first so that every time at least one of them would receive a good grade. Cheating was so rampant that before classes within the quiz window, I could here other students discussing the quizzes and how to solve them. When given a set amount of time to take the quizzes, it makes cheating very easy. I knew people who would be considered moral and wouldn’t lie or cheat on nearly anything, but they cheated on these quizzes. It was so easy to talk about and so many others were cheating, they likely didn’t feel guilty. In the article about fairness it made it clear that generally people want to be treated fairly, so they could’ve felt that because so many others were cheating their cheating, in their minds, levelled the playing ground. These quizzes were extremely difficult, which could also likely explain the large amount of cheating. However, it was clear that the main driver of cheating was giving students a window to take the quiz. I didn’t cheat and didn’t want to get involved in it, so I never learned why so many students cheated. I also took this class nearly two years ago, so I’m not sure if the class is run the same way, but I hope that they found a better way to administer their exams or quizzes.




Comments

  1. I'm not sure you're aware of this but for the Thanksgiving break, in particular, we used to have classes through the Wednesday right before the actual holiday. Indeed, that was the patter at most universities. When I was at Northwestern and would fly to NYC to see my parents (whose wedding anniversary was on Thanksgiving) it would be incredibly crowded. I learned that the Wednesday before Thanksgiving was the busiest day for air travel in the entire year. Somebody in the faculty Senate finally figured out that since actual attendance was low on Monday, lower on Tuesday, and then totally abysmal on Wednesday, we should just give those days off (and start three days earlier in the semester to offset that). Now students have the full week off, but still play the attendance games the week before. Hmmm.

    I think in a class like ours, where there is at least some class discussion attendance is a gift, as is participating in the discussion itself. Judging by how the class has performed this way, it would seem that many students don't agree. The last time I taught I did have an incentive of sorts to encourage attendance. Frankly, I'm more than a little disturbed by the current behavior. But I'm gathering it is the norm now. I think it is different in a large lecture class. Missing class makes more sense to me there.

    Regarding your other story about cheating, I won't ask you to comment on whether the same thing is happening with the quizzes in Moodle. I just want to note that a different explanation could be given for the Friday sessions being the most crowded. That is procrastination. Students do things at or near the deadline. So I wonder if you can actually "know" which is the true explanation and then how you know that. I will say the perception of widespread cheating almost sure has a pernicious impact on learning, even for those students who don't cheat, because they are caught up in the unfairness of it all. Given that, how could the instructional staff for the course not realize what's going on? That too needs some explanation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post 3

The summer after my freshman year I worked in a textbook warehouse as a warehouse associate. For the first week on the job, my sole responsibility was to stand near a conveyor belt and take totes with books off the line and sort the totes by the colored labels on them. This was at best mind numbing and monotonous, but it had to be done. Because this was early in the summer, the company was solely focused on buying used books to resell in the fall, so everyday hundreds of new books would be brought into the warehouse. The totes I took off would be picked up by other workers and the books inside would be placed in their appropriate location in the warehouse. This job, at least in my opinion, was far superior because it allowed you to walk around all day rather than being stuck along a conveyor belt for eight hours a day. However, after about a week and a half working the line, I was trained on the technology and began working as one of the people who put books away. I enjoyed this ...

Blog Post 4: Teams

            Group project can be one of the most annoying assignments required to do because of the possibility of being stuck doing the majority of work. Fortunately, the majority of group projects I have been part of haven’t turned out like this; however, they had other smaller problems. Almost all of the group projects I have been part of were for upper level econ classes. This has the benefit that most students chose to take these classes, so they are generally more knowledgeable and interested in the course content. This typically solves the problem of one or two students doing the entire project, but solving this problem uncovers a few smaller problems. My most recent group project is a prime example of some of these smaller problems.             This group project was for Econ 460, Financial Economics, and our team had to research and present on the financial health...

Final post

            Most of the 400 level economics classes I have taken, have not required attendance. Nearly all of them strongly encouraged it by reviewing the homework questions prior to the due date or limiting the slide shows posted on compass. The classes I have taken where attendance is required have almost exclusively been intro level classes, one hundred or two hundred level. I think the theory behind this is that intro level classes are needed to form a foundation of knowledge, but upper level classes are chosen and should fit your interests. In this system you are more or less forced to learn the intro material, even if it is in area you aren’t interested in. However, in later classes, attendance is expected to be higher because these classes aren’t specifically required, but rather chosen from a list. Although this is what would theoretically happen, in reality when attendance isn’t required not as many students show up to ...